| Minnesota
Sinfonia –Program Notes for Great Winter Festival
I, 2007-2008
Suite bergamasque Claude
Debussy (1862-1918)
Claude Debussy and Maurice Ravel are
considered to be the two dominant pillars of French music
during the early part of the twentieth century. Their
music is now called Impressionism, andcorresponded
to the movement in painting which bears the same name. Like
the French painters Monet, Renoir and Degas, these composers
wanted to convey moods and impressions, rather than exacting
and straightforward renderings. Their music is often
very sensuous, and must be performed emphasizing the many
colors inherent in the writing. In Debussy’s
case, he constantly repeated little phrases, so as to
blur the over all forms of the compositions, and to make
the listener concentrate more on the individual phrases,
than on the composition’s overall structure. Most of
Claude Debussy’s output was for the piano.
The Suite bergamasque is a set of four piano pieces,
originally composed in 1890 and then later revised in 1905. The
title may refer to something old, which makes sense given
that two of the movements are set in the dance forms of the
17th and 18th centuries, and in the case of the menuet, it
at least take the name of one of those historic forms. The
third movement, Claire de lune, is the exception,
and does not take its cue from tradition. In its first version,
it was called Promenade Sentimentale, and not until
the revision of 1905 did it take on its now familiar title,
and association with the moon. This piece often is played
alone, and is arguably Debussy’s most famous and popular
work. It has been transcribed for almost every conceivable
instrumental combination. Although overshadowed, the other
movements of this suite are excellent examples of Debussy’s
writing and style, and when performed as a whole, they offer
a very satisfying foray into his creative world. Debussy
created few works for orchestra. They all were very successful
and continue to be performed regularly in today’s
concert repertoire, but their lack of numbers has been frustrating
to the concert music stage. Because of this imbalance,
many of the piano works have been transcribed for orchestra,
or other instrumental combinations. Although the Suite
bergamasque has been arranged for larger orchestra,
I took the liberty of creating a new arrangement for the Sinfonia,
which of course is a small (chamber) orchestra. jf
Suite in e
mnor, opus 20 Edward
Elgar (1857-1934)
Edward Elgar, who is generally regarded
as England’s
most prominent romantic composer, is best known for only
a handful of orchestral works. The Enigma Variations,
The Cello Concerto and The Pomp and Circumstance
Marches are undoubtedly the most popular and recognizable
from his output.
At the onset of his career, aside from
violin lessons from a local teacher, he was largely self
taught. He had ambitions to study in Leipzig, but because
of family financial limitations, those dreams went unfulfilled. Consequently, his early
works were not particularly well crafted, and even though
they were performed in his native Worcester and surrounding
communities, they have been generally dismissed as being
undistinguished. In those early years, he made his
living by teaching, playing organ in the local churches and
violin in the area orchestras, one of which was conducted
by Antonin Dvorak.
As Elgar developed his compositional skills, and even after
he became famous (largely because of The Enigma Variations), his
music seemed to be out of touch with English critics. A quote
from E.J. Dent on modern English music stated,
For English ears, Elgar’s music
is too emotional and not quite free of vulgarity.
Even though a number of well-known composers
and critics (including George Bernard Shaw) came to his
defense, and the British Broadcasting Corporation continued
to play his music on the radio, Elgar’s popularity
in the concert hall diminished.
The Suite in e minor is a set of
three short movements, lasting a combined total of eleven minutes.
Written in 1892, it is a charming work that has a true romantic
flair – which
as can be imagined, is not in keeping with the contemporary
British introverted outlook of always keeping the stiff upper
lip…I think possibly because of its brevity, its aforementioned
qualities that tended against the grain, it been unjustly neglected
and should be heard and performed with regularity on the major
concert stages. jf
Violin Concert No. 1 in D Major, opus 6 Nicolo
Paganini (1782-1840)
Italian master violinist, Nicolo Paganini was considered
to be the greatest violinist of his day, and his reputation
is such, that many consider him to be the best of all time.
One of his contemporaries, and the great poet Goethe said
of Paganini,
I lack a base for this column of
sunbeams and cloud… I
heard something simply meteoric and was unable to understand
it.
During his London debut, the critic for the London Times
wrote;
You may not believe half of what I am telling you, and I
am not telling you half of what there is to be told
Nicolo started violin lessons before
age six with his father, and later received training from
the best violinists in Genoa. By the time he was thirteen
and went to Parma for further study, the teachers claimed
that they could not teach him anything that he did not
already know. So he started an intense self- education
program, often practicing up to fifteen hours a day! According to research explained in Philip Sandblom’s
book, Creativity and Disease, Paganini had Ehlers-Dalos
syndrome, which manifested itself in great flexibility in
his joints. This allowed him to double his reach on the violin
as compared to normal and mere mortal violinists, and he
was therefore able to develop a technical prowess that was
so amazing, that it was rumored he must have made a pact
with the devil.
Like so many contemporary and past virtuoso
performers, he composed solo works for his own performances.
History is full of great instrumentalists and composers
who did the same – Mozart and Beethoven to name but a few. But
none had the technical where-with-all as Paganini and in
fact much of the music that he wrote was so difficult that
it was unplayable by any of his contemporaries. His performances
of these works were so stunning that they brought him great
fame and fortune.
After listening to some of his creations,
one might guess that he played with a flair and abandonment (how could
he not?), and that this same attitude might carry over to
his personal life - which it did! He was a reckless
gambler, and on one occasion, he had to pawn his violin to
cover gambling debts. He then had to borrow a violin from
a French merchant so that he could make one of his performances.
That violin was a Guarnerius – one of the greatest
violins ever made, and the concert was such a success, that
the Frenchman gave the violin to the performer. Paganini
played this instrument for the rest of his life, and upon
his death, bequeathed it to the citizens of Genoa, where
it remains to this day.
The First violin concerto is amongst the
most popular of his six, and is often heard in today’s
concert halls. It has a classical format, with a very long
first movement, followed by shorter second movement and ending
with a light-hearted rondo. It is filled with all of the pyro-techniques
one associates with Paganini – left hand pizzicato, scales
in thirds and of course fast and dazzling passagework. But
it also has charm, beautiful singing melodies (influenced by
the Italian opera), and a light-hearted sense that makes it
a regular audience pleaser! jf
|